Uber loses VAT margin scheme appeal
The Court of Appeal has ruled that Uber cannot use the Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) when accounting for VAT on its ride-hailing services. The decision could have significant implications for businesses that act as intermediaries when supplying services to consumers. What was the dispute about?
The case concerned whether Uber could account for VAT under the TOMS, which allows businesses to pay VAT on their profit margin rather than the full value of a supply. The scheme is most commonly associated with the travel industry, but Uber argued that it should also apply to journeys arranged through its platform. HMRC disagreed, arguing that the services supplied by Uber did not fall within the scope of the TOMS. The Court of Appeal has now sided with HMRC, concluding that the scheme was not available in the circumstances. As a result, VAT must be accounted for under the normal rules rather than on the margin alone.
The financial implications are potentially significant. Applying VAT to the full value of journeys rather than the margin increases the amount of VAT due and may affect the commercial viability of certain business models that rely on acting as an intermediary between customers and service providers. Although the case focused on ride-hailing services, the decision may have wider relevance for businesses operating digital platforms and marketplace models. Companies that have considered using the TOMS outside traditional travel arrangements may need to review their VAT treatment in light of the judgment.
The ruling is another reminder that VAT schemes designed for specific sectors cannot automatically be extended to new business models, even where there are similarities in how services are supplied.
Related Topics
-
Accounting for VAT if there is no cash payment
Your business has submitted repayment returns for the last two quarters and you are concerned that you might have underpaid output tax on some supplies where no money has changed hands. Are your concerns justified?
-
Treatment of distributions under review
The government has launched a consultation on modernising the tax treatment of distributions and repayments of capital by companies. The proposals could affect the distinction between dividends taxed as income and capital payments subject to CGT. What changes are being considered?
-
Tax relief on equipment you haven’t paid for (yet)
The timing of tax relief for purchases of equipment isn’t straightforward when payments are delayed or goods are purchased through hire purchase (HP) agreements. How can you use these rules to your advantage and get tax relief before you’ve paid the final invoice?
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.